Various Types of Fire monitoring system

Fire monitoring systems are designed to discover fires early in their development when the time will still be available for the safe evacuation of occupants. Early detection also plays a significant role in protecting the safety of emergency response personnel. Human and property loss can be reduced and downtime for the operation minimized through early detection because control efforts are started while the fire is still small. Most alarm systems provide information to emergency responders on the location of the fire, speeding the process of fire control.

 

To be useful, detectors must be coupled with alarms. Alarm systems provide notice to at least the building occupants and usually transmit a signal to a staffed monitoring station either on or off-site. In some cases, alarms may go directly to the fire department, although in most locations this is no longer the typical approach.

 

Did you know that there are actually four different types of fire monitoring systems that are used to sense the presence of a fire? The best way to determine which kind of fire monitoring system is the right choice for your business or building is to understand the differences between them. The four various types of fire monitoring system are ionization/photoelectric, photoelectric, ionization, and heat. The differences in these four types are found in how they detect a fire – heat is obviously triggered by temperature while the other three are from the smoke.

 

Ionization

Ionization fire monitoring system actually have a constant electrical current running between two metal plates inside of the device. The electrical current is disrupted when smoke enters the device chamber and triggers the alarm. This type of detector is great for quickly identifying fires that are fast-burning.

 

Photoelectric

Photoelectric detectors work similarly to Ionization detectors, but with a beam of light instead of electricity. When smoke enters the chamber, the light beam is scattered, which then triggers the alarm. This type of device is good at identifying smaller fires than an ionization detector. They are known to be highly reliable and rarely produce false alarms.

 

Heat

Heat detectors work by detecting an increase in air temperature caused by flames. While these detectors have been known to trigger a few false alarms, they have a longer reaction time than other smoke detectors. False alarms may be triggered in buildings that are abnormally steamy, dusty, or humid and are best suited for buildings that are not continuously occupied such as warehouses or storage facilities.

 

Ionization/Photoelectric

A crowd favorite of many professionals, combination ionization and photoelectric fire monitoring system is considered by many to be the best type of detector. These devices house both types of smoke detectors (not heat) in one unit to ensure that any presence of smoke is detected as soon as possible.

 

Afantagé`s good and efficient emergency evacuation system equipment and hardware are almost 98 - 100% accurate. It helps to count, tally & track at exits and/or mustering areas. It is traceable to the last known badge-in and sign-in locale, or the exact last halting location. It helps to communicate information (not data) to first responders through an independent cloud-based execution system. It is autonomous. RFID reader provider from Afantagé has an automatic alert using sensors to track temperature, smoke, and gas that operate at multiple frequencies for different countries. It is reactionary to relay phone calls, SMS, email as well as sirens, lights, and sprinklers. All private information is withheld in the system unless the alarm is sounded. Afantagé with its non-obstructive installation procedure for the fire monitoring system is second in line and all its fail-safe measures work at a variety of angles. In addition, the ownership cost, maintenance, and licensing of Afantagé`s equipment and hardware are highly economical. To know more, visit- https://www.afantage.com/